← Research library

FTMO, The5ers or FundedNext: compare the exact programme

A needs-based checklist for comparing three prop programmes without mixing rules, account sizes or promotional payout figures.

FundedNext: what to establish before choosing a programme

Country eligibility comes before challenge selection. The terms checked on 27 October 2026 list both Vietnamese citizens and residents among the restricted groups for CFD services. The examples below explain the rules; they are not an invitation to buy a challenge from Vietnam.

Read the update: rules and worked examples

Stellar 2-Step: three payout choices

  • Standard cycle: first 21 days, then 14 days; base reward share 80%.
  • Three profitable days: each must reach at least 1% of the initial balance; base reward share 60%.
  • On-Demand: at least 2% account growth, with the best day no more than 40% of total profit; base reward share 90%.

The Stellar 2-Step page says the choice is fixed at purchase and cannot be changed afterwards. Paid options may differ; the highest share is not the default. Reaching a day count does not itself mean a reward has been approved, and processing after approval is different from receipt.

On this page 4 sections

Choose the comparison unit first

A brand-level ranking can conceal the details that decide whether a programme fits a trader. Start with FTMO CFD Challenge 2-Step Standard, The5ers High Stakes New and FundedNext Stellar 2-Step CFD with its standard payout option. These names define the scope, not a claim that the three contracts are interchangeable. Fix an account size and purchase date before comparing a fee or loss allowance.

Write down your own constraints before looking at a score: residence and citizenship, manual or automated trading, holding periods, news exposure and time available for review. This prevents a large advertised account or high headline reward share from determining a decision before basic compatibility is checked.

Four prop program checks: entry cost, loss rules, reward conditions and eligibility; these vary by program and stage.
An original FINEX educational illustration. Example figures, where shown, are hypothetical; they are not provider quotes or test results. Open full-size diagram
Diagram explained

A headline reward share is not a promise of payment.

  1. Match the exact program, size and phase. The purchase fee is not the same as a deposit or the displayed simulated capital.
  2. Read daily and total loss rules, trailing calculations, restricted strategies and news or weekend conditions.
  3. Check country eligibility, the contracting company, KYC, reward request dates and payment conditions. A payout headline alone does not answer these questions.

Use eligibility as a gate, not a score

An unavailable programme does not become suitable because it scores well on price. FundedNext’s current Terms section 5.3 excludes Vietnam residents and citizens from CFD Services. That makes an eligibility check essential for Vietnamese readers, and this comparison is not a recommendation to register. Apply the same discipline to every provider’s current country restrictions rather than inferring access from language support.

Next, identify the entity named in the agreement and the service being purchased. An incorporated company, a technology affiliate and a payment processor can perform different roles. Record the relevant counterparty rather than attaching every group company or licence to the account. Where the agreement is unavailable, keep the field unresolved.

Test rules against your own trading pattern

Model one ordinary day and one difficult day using the same hypothetical trades for each programme. Include an overnight position, trading costs and the daily reset. Compare the remaining room after the scenario instead of comparing percentages in isolation. The calculation should show which rule is binding first and which assumption could change the result.

For The5ers, published High Stakes and general 2-Step FAQs currently disagree on important limits. Mark those rows as unresolved until the purchased version is identified. Do not quietly use whichever rule makes a strategy appear viable. A comparison can still be useful when it shows exactly why a conclusion cannot yet be made.

Compare cash outcomes last

Use the same hypothetical profit, then apply each exact option’s reward share, eligibility requirements, payout timing and transaction charges. Separate a fee refund from recurring trading rewards. Include the cost of optional features only when you actually need them. A programme with a higher headline split can deliver a different cash outcome after thresholds, waiting periods or fees.

The useful final answer is a conditional shortlist: fits these needs, conflicts with these needs, or needs clarification on these provisions. Keep the sources and verification date beside the conclusion. None of those categories predicts passing a challenge, future profitability or an approved payout, and FINEX has not conducted comparative account tests for this checklist.

Continue your research

Sources and scope

Sources are provider publications. Conditions may vary by entity, country, account and program. Recheck before signing up.

  1. FTMO 2-Step programme scope
  2. The5ers High Stakes programme scope
  3. FundedNext Stellar 2-Step programme scope
  4. FundedNext eligibility and contractual provider
  5. The5ers named High Stakes risk rules
  6. The5ers general 2-Step rules requiring version checks

Need help choosing?

Leave one way to reach you. FINEX will contact you about your request.

contact@finexbroker.com
Add a provider (optional)

Sent securely via FormSubmit. Do not include passwords or account documents.